I deciphered the Indus Valley Script
What's up guys.I haven't written in a long time as I have been busy with tests more like
Netflix😅 to be honest.
But I also found out something really cool.Even if you are not a nerd you will like this because even I am not a nerd.Or maybe I am a 🤓.
So Mohenjo-daro as we know is located in Pakistan very close to Iran where Persian is spoken even Pakistan's language Urdu is somewhat similar to Persian.
It is important to note in history all languages and script mostly evolve from other languages and scripts.
It is written from right to left, also paleo - Hebrew numerals are just like roman numerals.
So first part of the inscription is 1.The h like symbol is actually h 😂 I looked up many related scripts and their evolutions.The second symbol(from the right)looks exactly like kaph in paleo hebrew so it will be pronounced 'k'.
The fish symbol is pronounced meen and is already researched by other historians.
Hakmeen in Persian means king
And the first symbol which i kind of ignored is like resh which means head and head is also used to show authority in many places like headman and headmaster.
And the second last symbol looks like beyt which means that the king got two houses
This suggests the fact that there could be multiple kings
This also symbolically means 1 man catching fish or the 1st man who caught a fish or multiple fishes.
This could even mean that 1st man who caught a fish become the main king.
Also as we can see from the illustration there as a hammer which looks like Thor's hammer and an unicorn which probably is a goat.
And this is probably true because Thor is a part of Norse literature and there was a lot of migration towards India at this time and hebrew , phoenecians were all connected and migrated until they settled which was probably at Mohenjodaro.
Also the old script of Sweden,France which is known as the runic script which is very simlar you can check it on the website named omniglot.com.
Thank you for reading and please share this on social media.This is a big historical discovery however this may not be 100 percent correct it is my intepretation and should be discussed by historians before it is taken to seriously.
Comments
Post a Comment